Comparing performance on a list learning test (California Verbal Learning Test, 2nd edition [CVLTII] ) in two different groups

Combine the data from the three papers and compare the mean values on the three CVLT-II variables to (the papers will be provided) the appropriate normative group. Summarize the findings in a table and visually display them in a graph. Draw conclusions about the two groups (clinical sample and normative sample) in terms of their CVLTII performance. Interpret your findings and reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of your methodology and their implications to the validity of your conclusions. This section is analogous to a discussion section of a research report or summary and conclusions to a literature review. This paper should have four sections (introduction, methods, results, and discussion); be formatted in APA (6th edition) style; and should not exceed 10 pages (double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman fonts, 1-inch margins), not counting the title page, references, tables and graphs. Absolutely no plagiarism, rephrase anything. Clinical Population: Alzheimer's Come up with a hypothesis for each of the following with a justification. Examples: SD-FR Hypothesis: People with Alzheimer’s will perform worse than those in the normal population Justification: Alzheimer’s patients have memory loss, SD-FR will reveal if their memory loss is short term. LD-FR Hypothesis: People with Alzheimer’s will perform worse than those in the normal population Justification: Alzheimer’s patients have memory loss. LD-FR will reveal if their memory loss is long term. Recognition Hits Hypothesis: People with Alzheimer’s will perform worse than those in the normal population. Justification: Alzheimer’s patients have problems recognizing stimuli that is familiar.